| The SF, Horror and Fantasy Film Review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Science-Fiction |
|
|
| Horror |
|
|
| Fantasy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BELLS
aka
THE CALLING; MURDER BY PHONE
Rating: 
Canada. 1981.
Director – Michael Anderson, Screenplay – Michael Butler, John Kent Harrison & Dennis Shryack, Story – Butler, Shryack, George Armando & James Whiton, Producer – Robert Cooper, Photography – Reginald H. Morris, Music – John Barry, Special Effects – Ken Estes, Bill Myatt, Henry Preisig & Dick Taylor, Production Design – Seamus Flannery. Production Company – CoCo Film Productions/Famous Players/Canadian Film Development Corporation.
Cast:
Richard Chamberlain (Dr Nat Bridger), Sara Botsford (Ridley Taylor), John Houseman (Dr Stanley Markowitz), Gary Reineke (Detective Meara), Barry Morse (Fred Waites), Robin Gammell (Noah Clayton)
Plot: While travelling to another city for a conference, environmentalist Nat Bridger agrees to pick up the belongings of a friend’s daughter who has died. But there he becomes fascinated with the circumstances of her death where she was reportedly blown up by a telephone in a subway that one witness says “emitted lightning”. Bridger’s investigation takes him inside a telephone company coverup in search of an embittered employee who has developed a means of transmitting deadly explosive signals down telephone wires.
This thriller comes from director Michael Anderson. Anderson, whose directing career spans fifty years, had some with fame with films like The Dam Busters (1954) and Around the World in 80 Days (1956) but is more known within the genre for his ham-fisted butcherings of original literary works in the likes of Doc Savage – The Man of Bronze (1975), Logan’s Run (1976), the tv mini-series The Martian Chronicles (1980) and Millennium (1989). Anderson is also responsible for what is perhaps one of the worst films ever made – Second Time Lucky (1984).
Here Anderson does a passable job of turning an everyday item – the telephone – into an object of unease. But the film seems confused about what it wants to be. It draws on the post-Watergate conspiracy thriller with lots of scenes of official blocking, evasions, coverups and so on. Unfortunately the actual motivation for the killings has nothing whatsoever to do with a widespread coverup – it is a more mundane underdog seeking revenge plot – and as a result the paranoid thriller tone of the film is at odds with what the actual script is about. The entire mood of the film in the first half just ends up being one big red herring.
The actual phone killings are quite silly – victims start shaking, bleed, then blow up and are thrown across the room. In some shots one can clearly see the cut from a person to the dummy that is blown up. Although surely the most colossal moment of implausibility is that within moments of Chamberlain ringing up the faults division of a phone company that a repairman would turn up to a subway station to replace the phone. The film’s plot about an underdog seeking revenge for the petty injustices of life does get petty – he blows up an IRS clerk because one of his forms has been lost or a bank teller for turning him away when the bank has closed.
Copyright Richard Scheib 1994
|