| The SF, Horror and Fantasy Film Review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Science-Fiction |
|
|
| Horror |
|
|
| Fantasy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BODY DOUBLE
Rating: 
USA. 1984.
Director/Producer/Story Brian De Palma, Screenplay Brian De Palma & Robert J. Avrech, Photography Stephen H. Burum, Music Pino Donaggio, Music Conductor Natale Massara, Makeup Effects Tom Burman, Production Design Ida Random. Production Company Columbia.
Cast:
Craig Wasson (Jake Scully), Melanie Griffith (Holly Body), Deborah Shelton (Gloria Rovelle), Gregg Henry (Sam Bushard/Henry Rovelle), Guy Boyd (Detective McClean), Dennis Franz (Rubin)
Plot: Out-of-work actor Jake Scully returns home to find his girlfriend in bed with another man. Fellow actor Sam Bushard offers him the use of his apartment while he is out of town so that Jake can sort himself out. Sam shows him a neighbouring house where a woman performs a solo erotic dance every night. Jake becomes fascinated with the dance and watches the woman through binoculars and then starts following her. But he is helpless to act as, while watching, he sees an Indian break into the house and murder the woman with a power-drill. But later while watching a promo clip for a porn movie on a cable channel he sees an actress performing the very same erotic dance as the murdered woman and comes to realize he is the dupe in an elaborate set-up.
Brian De Palma became one of the genres foremost stylists through a series of horror movies made in the late 1970s and early 1980s Sisters/Blood Sisters (1973), The Phantom of the Paradise (1976), Obsession (1976), Carrie (1976), The Fury (1978), Dressed to Kill (1980), Blow Out (1981), and this.
De Palma is a director who divides critics between either great love or savage dismissal. De Palmas films are made with extraordinary flourishes of style split-screen, slow-motion camerawork, flashy showoff cinematographic tricks. But at the same time they are also enormously derivative, especially of Hitchcock Obsession is a blatant remake of Vertigo (1958) and Dressed to Kill of Psycho (1960). Since Body Double, with the exception of Raising Cain (1992), De Palma has abandoned the genre for mainstream gangster and action films like Scarface (1983), The Untouchables (1987), Carlitos Way (1993) and Mission: Impossible (1996). And, at least in this authors regard, this is a career path that is less interesting and personal than De Palmas genre one.
Body Double was De Palmas most flagrant stealing of Hitchcock. The film is a virtual remake of Vertigo with a good deal of Rear Window (1954) also thrown in for measure. But it is not only Hitchcock that De Palma is rehashing it also seems like hes rehashing De Palma too. The film reads like a dot-to-dot of De Palma themes the Vertigo-like theme of double identity and role confusion (Sisters, Obsession), the film or dream-within-a-dream reality twister opening/ending (Sisters, Blow Out, Dressed to Kill, Carrie), the long seductive pursuit of a woman by a male stranger (Dressed to Kill), the Psycho-like jolt of killing off of the lead female halfway through (Dressed to Kill). De Palma has always been more interested in style and surface glitter than substance something that tends to work for or against his films depending on the plot and performances but here that precarious balance that he managed to keep in check in most previous films teeters over. This is the worst of his genre films.
There are occasional moments of style particularly the Indians attack on Deborah Shelton seen through the binoculars, which comes as only a silent pantomime accompanied only by Craig Wassons off-screen comments. Pino Donaggio also contributes a wonderful score. And theres a reasonable cast, most notably Melanie Griffith whose usual ditzy bubblehead blonde thing is well-suited to the part.
But the plot is so ludicrously contrived that the whole film falls apart upon a moments serious reflection. The killers plan is based on absurdly contrivedly schemes which are entirely dependant not only on Wassons being home but also watching through the binoculars at certain times, his becoming obsessed with and following the woman, the two of them meeting by coincidence with neither in the know at a roadblock, as well as his being courageous enough to admit to being a peeping tom and a stalker to the police? What would have happened to the entire scheme if Rovelle had been brought in as a witness in the police case and Jake had happened to meet him in court? Other pieces just dont make sense why does Shelton buy a pair of panties in a lingerie store and then simply throw them away outside the shop? The film is further capped by a De Palma-esque reality-twister ending which adds great confusion. The film is filled with so many ridiculous coincidences and necessary improbabilities that the plot feels like a sieve.
Copyright Richard Scheib 1990
|