| The SF, Horror and Fantasy Film Review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Science-Fiction |
|
|
| Horror |
|
|
| Fantasy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOST HIGHWAY
Rating:   ½
USA/France. 1997.
Director/Sound Design David Lynch, Screenplay David Lynch & Barry Gifford, Producers Deepak Nayar, Tom Sternberg & Mary Sweeney, Photography Peter Deming, Music Angelo Badalamenti, Additional Music Barry Adamson, Production Design Patricia Norris. Production Company Ciby 2000/Asymmetrical.
Cast:
Bill Pullman (Fred Madison), Balthazar Getty (Pete Dayton), Patricia Arquette (Renee Madison/Alice Wakefield), Robert Loggia (Mr Eddy/Dick Laurent), Robert Blake (Mystery Man), Natasha Gregson Wagner (Sheila)
Plot: Saxophonist Fred Madison and his wife Renee are troubled by a series of mysterious packages left at their door. Each package contains a videotape that shows someone entering their house and filming them while they sleep. At a party Fred meets a mystery man who insists he is at Freds house right at that moment and to prove it rings the house where his other self answers the phone. Then Fred receives a videotape of himself standing over Renees slaughtered body. He abruptly comes around to find himself sentenced to the electric chair for her murder. But prison authorities then inexplicably find mechanic Pete Dayton in Freds cell and Fred nowhere to be found. Baffled, they are forced to let Pete go. Pete returns to work but becomes drawn into the schemes of the mobster Mr Eddy. There he is attracted to Mr Eddys girlfriend Alice Wakefield who bears an uncanny resemblance to Renee.
Lost Highway was David Lynchs first film in five years, breaking the long absence following the critical drubbing and financial failure of Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (1992). Lynchs return had been long awaited but Lost Highway opened to heavily divided reviews. (Indeed the international promotional campaign triumphantly boasted the negative reviews as part of its advertising as some mark of cult approval). Whatever the reviews may differ about, the one thing they seem to agree about is that Lost Highway is completely incomprehensible.
Lost Highway starts out as a near great film. Lynch hooks one with the bizarre goings-on the series of videotapes that start keep intruding further and further into Bill Pullmans life. And there is one truly amazing sequence where Bill Pullman encounters white-faced Robert Blake at a party Blake insists they have met before, Pullman says he doesnt think so, Blake says it was at Pullmans house and as a matter of fact Im there right now and pulls out a cellphone to prove the point, getting Pullman to dial his home number whereupon Blakes voice tells him I told you so. Lynch evokes an unbearable sense of ominousness throughout. The scenes in Bill Pullmans apartment with its bare modernist walls, low lighting and patches of heavy shadow evoke a sense of dread out of which it seems anything might emerge.
But thereafter Lynch loses the plot altogether. Quite literally. Lost Highway becomes a completely different film. Bill Pullman is jailed for murder and inexplicably changes into Balthazar Getty and the film takes up a new plot altogether. Everything regarding the murder of Patricia Arquette and the mystery man videotaping things is dropped completely. Lost Highway then sort of turns into what starts to seem like a film noir piece with Balthazar Getty becoming involved with mobster Robert Loggia and conducting an illicit affair with Loggias girlfriend (who is also played by Patricia Arquette) and becoming drawn into her plot (which may not be all it seems) to do someone in and steal money so they can run away together. If anything Lost Highway could almost be called David Lynchs version of Alfred Hitchcocks Vertigo (1958) if one can accept a Vertigo where the film is not concerned whether the two women are the same or not, and where the hero and the entire plot change at the same time! Lost Highway has all the elements for a classic film noir thriller only Lynch doesnt really seem interested in the thriller aspect of it. At the point where Balthazar Getty and Patricia Arquette become involved in the murder any other film would have used the opportunity to start putting the screws on an audience but Lynch is not even interested in what happens and heads off into complete incomprehensibility.
As to the ending, what is going on could be anybodys guess even Lynchs, he having admitted he is as baffled by what the film means as the audience. The trouble with David Lynch is that his last few directorial efforts the final episode of Twin Peaks, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me this and the subsequent likes of Mulholland Dr. (2001) and Inland Empire (2006) show him charting a clear course away from anything approaching narrative coherence into a violent, intensive and chaotic surrealism. Unfortunately none of it really appears to mean anything. One has no problem with surrealism but surrealism usually means something either in terms of shock juxtaposition of imagery or a connecting symbolism that lies beneath the surface. Or else it leaves one dazzled at its daring in leaving things unexplained, as in Blow Up (1966) or The Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975). There are no films that are more daringly incomprehensible than Lynchs own Eraserhead (1977), but the brilliance of Eraserhead was not its confusion but rather its creation of a world of seeming dream logic and a self-contained universe that made its own sense. Surrealism usually signposts what it is doing if it confuses it achieves brilliance by signposting its defiance of traditional expectations of plot coherence. Lost Highway on the other hand is none of these. It is like a roomful of staircases all leading nowhere.
David Lynchs other films of genre interest are Eraserhead (1977), Dune (1984), Blue Velvet (1986), Twin Peaks (1990), Wild at Heart (1990), tvs
Twin Peaks (1990-1), Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (1992), Mulholland Dr. (2001) and Inland Empire (2006).
Copyright Richard Scheib 1997
|